2008/4/22, paolo del bene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ii think that i think that we must invite people to have a new approach with: books, software, music and movies. people first must to study, because in italy only 11% go to the university. then they must understood that is good to share anything, but licenses, contracts must be respected. is good to share software only if is distributed with the GNU General Public License and the last one BSD license compatibile with the GPL. is good to share documentation, books, manuals, guides if these one are distributed with the GNU Free Documentation License or Creative Commons, i preefer GPL for software and GFDL for texts. We must invite people to create, realize things, and at the same time to encurage to use things totally free. (free software refers not price but freedom so think free speech, not free beer). in italian as in french to say that a think have no price we said gratis, but free has the same signify: libero. we must say people don't use software, books, movies, music if it is not free. but for the actual things again copyrighted, they must respect the authors, because a big community could have more repressive laws as just happened in 2001 till 2006 with berlusconi and from 2006-2008 with prodi, but rutelli of partito democratico and giuliano urbani popolo delle libertà have in common one think penalize who share anything, and so to create legal problems to any person. now i left you to the original text that i readed in italian, but translated for you in english for you.
The peer to peer ? It's a crime Word of Rutelli Que if vayan todos the minister of the Cultural Assets answers negatively to a petition that asks the overcoming for proibizionista logic of the laws on the intellectual property 2223 March 2007 - BenOlds Source: The Manifest (http://www.ilmanifesto.it) WWhich is the difference between the previous Minister of the Assets and the Cultural Activities, the City Giuliano blue, and the holder in loads Francisco Rutelli? The first one spoke little, but when it took to the word on issues dirimenti like the intellectual property the reasons of the record enterprises, cinematographic, publishing they had found their defender. Who used, and uses, the net in order to share on-linens deposited collective intelligence in the serveur of Internet went, according to Giuliano City, subordinate to control, until emanating a decree that equipara the peer-to-peer to penal crime. Francisco Rutelli, instead, speaks very. But as far as the intellectual property he is online of continuity with its precedessore. Some days before the holder of the Ministry of the Cultural Assets a petition of the association "Altroconsumo" has reached in which it is asked Rutelli see again the Italian norm on the peer-to-peer. In particular, this association of the consumers, fort of beyond diecimila companies the collections, proposed the overcoming of City the proibizionista logic of the decree that previews penal endorsements for who exchanges musical rows, video and other. The first answer has had it from Peter Folena of the Commission Culture, that it has expressed its consent regarding the spirit of the pespirit of the petition. From Rutelli instead a letter of answer that is all a program. For the defender of the wedding between the devil and the Saint water (laws: enterprises and consumers), the copyright is sacred, as the wedding. They go established rules, supports Rutelli in the answer to "Altroconsumo", but troubles to put in argument the sacralità of the intellectual property. The peer-to-peer it must therefore remain a crime, even if Rutelli, in order to save the spirit, rifà to a savee the spirit, rifà to a savee spirit, rifà to alli, in order to save the spirit, rifà to aapplied to a process that judges a previous fact the City approval of the decree. Therefore, no intention to modify that norm. Therefore, continuity with the defendersntinuity with the defendersecord, cinematographic industries. With goodphic industries. With goodof the "consumers". In the passed one and concitata electoral campaign, the Union had sent marks them of availability towards the reasons of the variegato universe of the activists of the cyberspace. It is clear: no revolution, but adhesion to how much of innovative had been manifested to international level on the intellectual property. Translate in simple terms: acceptance of the principÃ(R) of the copyright, but propensione for a mixed system that puts on the same one slowly produced open source or free. With the consequent abandonment of the police and penal persecution of who it shares saperi and acquaintance against the regimen of the intellectual property. Insomma, "a moderated" point of view, that it very made however to hope. Of that availability if trace in the acts of the government of Prodi Roman is lost some. The stillicidio continues of police operations - they mails, financial police, lacks the police officers, but soon also they will adapt themselves, because they are in the faithful centuries - against who she uses the net like common good. It is time that also in Italy goes the Argentine adage: "Que if vayan todos". http://www.peacelink.it/cybercultura/a/20993.html _______________________________________________ Advocate mailing list [email protected] http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
