Hi,

Unfortunately it isn't possible to return the API unit usage per
method for multiple customers.  You can either get the usage per
customer or per method, but not both at once.  The full list of
options is available here:

  
http://code.google.com/apis/adwords/v2009/docs/reference-v200909/InfoService.InfoSelector.html

Best,
- Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team

On Jul 22, 6:13 am, rafal <rafal.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I try to find out how many api bids each I spend on each of my
> customers for specified method.
>
> Here is the request generated, but no matter what serviceName and
> methodName I define, I always get the overall api bids count per given
> customer
>  <env:Body>
>     <n3:get xmlns:n3="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/info/
> v200909">
>       <n3:selector>
>         <n3:serviceName>AdGroupCriterionService</n3:serviceName>
>         <n3:methodName>mutate</n3:methodName>
>         <n3:operator>SET</n3:operator>
>         <n3:dateRange xmlns:n4="https://adwords.google.com/api/adwords/
> cm/v200909">
>           <n4:min>20100721</n4:min>
>           <n4:max>20100721</n4:max>
>         </n3:dateRange>
>         <n3:clientEmails>xxx</n3:clientEmails>
>         <n3:clientEmails>yyy</n3:clientEmails>
>         <n3:clientEmails>zzz</n3:clientEmails>
>         <n3:apiUsageType>UNIT_COUNT_FOR_CLIENTS</n3:apiUsageType>
>       </n3:selector>
>     </n3:get>
>   </env:Body>
>
> Is it possible to have customer api bids values divided by methods?

-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en

Reply via email to