Thanks a lot for the reply.
Another question is: if I do not specify paging, will it return all the
creatives?
Thanks
Eric
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:19 AM, AdWords API Advisor <
adwordsapiadvi...@google.com> wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
>
> Yes, it is possible with Generic Selectors. You can use the IN predicate as
> long as you have the ids of all ad groups. For example, in Ruby:
>
> selector = {
>
>
> :fields => ['Id', 'Status'],
>
>
> :ordering => [{:field => 'Id', :sort_order => 'ASCENDING'}],
>
>
> :predicates => [
>
>
> {:field => 'AdGroupId', :operator => 'IN', :values => [id1, id2,
> id3...]}
> ]
>
> }
>
> So you can do one query to get AdGroups list and another one to get all ads
> of it.
>
>
> -Danial, AdWords API Team.
>
> --
> =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
> Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
> http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
> =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
> To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
>
--
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
