Hi Reed, The behavior you described is as designed. The goal of the CRITERIA report was to have one report that included data from keywords, placements, etc. It segments the data by the criterion that triggered the impression, so you can determine how well your criteria are performing. The domains and URLs that your ads were shown on is not always the same as the criteria that triggered it; remember, there are many criteria types that trigger automatic placements (verticals, audiences, etc) beyond contextual keyword matching and placements. Although automatic placements seem similar to placement criteria, they are more accurately the effect of other criteria, and not a criterion on their own.
What this means is that determining the "Other" row data will still require some math. However, having all the criteria data in one report should make that process simpler. Best, - Eric Koleda, AdWords API Team -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
