Hi Manuel,

I don't have any updates, but I'm glad to know the problem is no longer 
affecting you.

Best,
- Eric

On Monday, March 12, 2012 7:28:39 AM UTC-4, Manuel wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
> do you have an update ? When I tested a couple of days ago, the delay 
> seemed to be gone, but I'd like to have a confirmation about this issue.
>
> Thanks in advance, best
> Manuel
>
> Am Montag, 27. Februar 2012 22:34:13 UTC+1 schrieb Eric Koleda:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The core engineering team has confirmed that some accounts may experience 
>> a small delay between changing keyword data and seeing the change in 
>> reports.  The delay is in the order of minutes, and is leading to the 
>> differences you are seeing.  They are working to eliminate this delay and 
>> I'll let you know when I have more information.
>>
>> Best,
>> - Eric
>>
>> On Friday, February 24, 2012 5:14:13 AM UTC-5, Manuel wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael, hi Eric,
>>> I guess I'm experiencing the same issues with adhoc keyword performance 
>>> reports.
>>> After adding and deleting several keywords via the API and retrieving a 
>>> new report afterwards, some of the deleted keywords still exist in the 
>>> report and vice versa, whereas UI results are up-to-date.
>>> Since our application syncronizes an account's data with the report, 
>>> this behavior is crucial to us. 
>>> As a matter of fact, by trying to syncronize with deprecated data, our 
>>> application tries to delete already removed keywords, which will result in 
>>> an API error
>>>
>>> EntityNotFound.INVALID_ID @ operations[0].operand.criterion.id; 
>>> trigger:\'*****\'
>>>
>>> I already found out, that statistical data (clicks, conversions etc.) 
>>> are updated in nightly cronjobs and are not presented in real-time. Does 
>>> this circumstance also apply to the overall "up-to-dateness" of the 
>>> keywords (without regarding statistical data). But that seems to be in 
>>> contrary to your statement, that the report-data reflects the UI-data.
>>>
>>> I'm really interested in the outcome of Michael's case, since that seems 
>>> to reflect the same issue. Please let me know, if I could help in any case.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Manuel
>>>
>>> PS: we did not experience those issues with the old v13 reporting 
>>> services...
>>
>>

-- 
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~
Also find us on our blog and discussion group:
http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api
=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "AdWords API Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en

Reply via email to