Hi The latter is the case. That was intentional change, but has been rolled back. But in either case, it should be fixed now.
Best, - Takeshi, AdWords API Team On Monday, January 21, 2013 10:48:24 PM UTC+9, oseemann wrote: > > Was this change an unintentional mistake that is now fixed or was it an > intentional change that, sort of, had unforeseen consequences and has been > rolled back? > > I'm asking because we have developed workarounds over the weekend > (splitting report downloads by campaign ids) and the answer might be > helpful while deciding whether to keep the workarounds around or not. > -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en
