Hello Oliver,
As a technical team we can not comment on legal or RMF questions. I'll highlight it internally with a relevant team but I can't promise a follow-up. -Danial, AdWords API Team. On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 11:06:37 AM UTC+4, oseemann wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > thanks for your input. What you say makes sense and it matches our > assessment of the situation. > > I'm hoping that someone from the developer relations team can acknowledge > the conflict between RMF and API. Interpretations are always subjective and > it'd be nice to have an official statement. > > Oliver > > Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013 23:39:28 UTC+2 schrieb Jason Stedman: >> >> You cannot create a campaign with Conversion Optimizer bidding scheme, as >> you said it must become eligible first. I interpret this RMF requirement to >> mean you must support converting from another bidding scheme to Conversion >> Optimizer once a campaign becomes eligible. The best explanation of how >> this is to be done is this post here : >> >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/adwords-api/conversion$20optimizer$20/adwords-api/gJhz7GwWpf0/Ies4ID6PCysJ >> >> You should check with the policy team to confirm that the above >> assumption is correct before proceeding, but it is really the only way I >> can make sense of it. However, I do not work for Google and cannot confirm >> this myself. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> Jason >> >> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 4:10:32 PM UTC-4, oseemann wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> The Required Minimum Functionality (v.020613) states that supporting the >>> Conversion Optimizer bidding scheme is required for campaign creation (item >>> number C.115). >>> >>> However, the API does not allow creating campaigns with the Conversion >>> Optimizer bidding scheme. It will fail with >>> CANNOT_CREATE_CAMPAIGN_WITH_CONVERSION_OPTIMIZER. Also, it seems >>> campaigns need to become eligible for that bidding scheme first (i.e. >>> accumulate conversions) before it can be switched. >>> It appears that RMF and API implementation are in conflict. Can you give >>> advise on how to solve this? >>> (I already asked the policy team, they directed me to this forum). >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Oliver >>> >> -- -- =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ Also find us on our blog and discussion group: http://adwordsapi.blogspot.com http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to adwords-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/adwords-api?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AdWords API Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to adwords-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
