On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:30:30AM +0100, Michal Fojtik wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Tomas Sedovic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11/22/2012 08:42 AM, Martin Povolny wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> Many of the developers agree with dropping cucumber. No one was against > >> it. Reasons where given in a different thread. > > > > I'd like to point out that everyone who replied to the previous thread was > > in Brno. Today's Thanksgiving in the US so I wouldn't be surprised if they > > didn't even get to the email. > > > > I recommend we wait before declaring consensus at least until Monday. > > +1 > > Sorry for keeping advocating Minitest: > > http://metaskills.net/2011/03/26/using-minitest-spec-with-rails/ > > You can also use Minitest with Capibara in Rails. > > As I mentioned, the minitest pros is that it is part of the Ruby > standard library, so no extra dependencies. It has lovely DSL and it is > highly extendable :) >
I personally do not care. Minitest is as fine as RSpec is. But from the project point of view, given we have the rest of test is RSpec, I see no reason to change that. -- Martin Povolny <[email protected]> tel. +420777714458
