On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 13:58 +0100, Jan Provaznik wrote: > Interesting is Martyn's proposal to leave message bus usage on > deployment decision. This sounds good to me, but it also means that > simple non-robust callback support is sufficient for default deployment > (w/o ESB). I don't think this is true - I can't imagine there are many > situations where the simple callback system is sufficient.
I would be very careful introducing deployment options here - the communications between components is a core piece of the architecture and not all that easy to debug and troubleshoot; by allowing users to swap these out, you'll introduce a lot of QA/support overhead, and it's not unlikely that one of these variants will be buggy enough that people won't use them. David
