On 22.1.2013 16:10, Matt Wagner wrote:
I don't love that it gives us a letter grade, A-F, for each bit of code. It makes it easy to understand, but I think it also makes it too easy to fall into a trap of taking its suggestions as gospel. Poking around, I seem to agree with everything it's complaining about. But I think the decision of what to refactor should always be based on a human's review of code (assisted by tools like this), not just based on the letter grade it gives. (No one has argued otherwise, and I agree with the approach of refactoring the complex code. I just think it's important to remember that we're ultimately in charge.)
+1 J.
