>PoMo makes art real and can only do so by means of a vulgar materialism and irony - or it makes art political by removing it from the field of the contemplative and making it aesthetically conceptual.(Saul)
Doesn't "vulgar materialism and irony" effectively promote the world of free market capitalism ? It effectively supports a specific political philosophy and set of institutions. What could be more political than that? On other the other hand, Saul, when has aesthetically conceptual art ever been political ? Can you offer an example ? ____________________________________________________________ Buried in medical files? Click here for information on an electronic system. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/Ioyw6ijndjKsADiMs55X2A0pZhJ8cw KhQZ60FKcK8evU9S66GSOT8g/
