On Oct 31, 2008, at 3:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good God, man -- know you not the difference a restrictive clause
and a
non-restrictive one?!
Huh?
And thus the difference between proper and improper uses of
'which' and 'that' and the needed employment of commas to indicate
non-restrictive?
First it was "impactive" and now it's "restrictive" and what-all.
You're being quite detective, aren't you! And what's this "needed
employment"? Are you trying to insinuate some political plan to stem
the rising number of unemployment claims?
I'm afraid that, if you continue this grammatical misbehavior, much
as I hat
to do it I shall have to call in Michael!
I'd tip my hate to you, if I wore one.
(Forgive me for not being more excoriating, but I am writing this
posting in
haste.)
Don't you mean, "for not being more excoriative"?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
