The problem with applying neuroscience to creativity begins with the problem of identifying just where some degree of creativity has occurred.
Apparently Michael's grandchildren rejected his storytelling. Does that mean that Michael can't tell a story ? Or -- does it just mean that his stories didn't entertain that particular audience and the storyteller got discouraged? And if you're going to insist that differences in aesthetic value are nothing more than personal, subjective opinion --- the study of creativity is going to be a non-starter. Theodore Shaw tried to avoid this issue by presenting "rareness" as the ultimate purpose of creativity in all the arts-- but if we wish to distinguish rareness from rarity, we will be disappointed with his effort. ____________________________________________________________ Start a rewarding Medical Transcriptionist career. Click to find affordable and flexible programs. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/PnY6rc1wtujWch6IuxMJpRRgUmDZAx mG2lhxywQliyPJeEFk4CXoo/
