Yes, I agree. Nature, the out there, is what it is. It can't have a right-wrong value. That's our job (curse). Of course, I do accept (believe) in the "out there" as an existence independent of my knowing it. WC
--- On Wed, 12/31/08, Michael Brady <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Michael Brady <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Malcolm Gladwell and beliefs) > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, December 31, 2008, 12:00 PM > On Jan 1, 2009, at 12:37 PM, William Conger wrote: > > > It may origniate in truth (the unprocessed actuality > of experience) > > That's a really good way of putting it. And it suggests > two things: > > 1. "Unprocessed actuality" [nature? existence? > "out there"?] is never > wrong. > 2. Lies and error come from the processing or > "using" of the > representation of experience. > > > | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > Michael Brady > [email protected]
