Has anyone ever presented a theory of art  that clearly denies the possibility
of an artwork including its own explanatory text (something more extensive
than just a title?)


>Ordinarily, an artwork cannot be assured by its explanation yet is unlikely
to be ruined by any explanation. (WC)


____________________________________________________________
Click to shop and save on brand name copiers today.
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxWsA5NaUHjEMVrFse9xZrrjx
cbRhspqWuJsF6hkhAaGbnxz0pep5u/

Reply via email to