Who is qualified to determine normal architecture as Frances defines it -- i.e. "the ideal norm and this normative norm is simply what ought to be" ?
Regarding issues of safety, cost, longevity --- I'm sure that many professional consultants would qualify on the basis of testable knowledge of structure, materials, competitive economic conditions etc. But what about aesthetics? Is it even possible for an ideal norm to be shared? Has anyone here known anyone else who shared his or her ideal aesthetic norms of architecture? I never have. I just wrote a review of the new Modern Wing of the Art Institute. I hated it -- everybody else loves it - but for a variety of different reasons. ____________________________________________________________ Find solutions for your business. Click here and get it done now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxUki9xtzqnjQGyljDk3Poep9 baMzIPEz8y9CKJi9la34KG5NAP1Qk/
