> Miller seems to like art which works off a sort of secondary set of clues-using Claude marks to draw a tree so that the viewer compares the marks not to the tree which they have just seen but the marks used to draw a tree in a Claude and then awards the work in front of them marks for resmbling or not resembling the Claude tree without ever realizing the secondary nature of their perceptions. Kate Sullivan
You mean Claude Lorraine? How did you come to that conclusion, Kate? I certainly like Claude Lorraine, and would even go to Cleveland (gasp!) to see a big exhibit of him, but I don't think I'm especially partial to how he draws trees. I.e. there are probably a lot of drawings which you might say had "Claude trees" which I would never want to see a second time. And the quality that I've been calling "inevitable and resolved" certainly does not come from how closely the clues'symbolization marks resemble the clues I use to make my way about in the world. (because I get that feeling from things that are as different as Chinese landscape from Luca Cambiaso from Vlanminck from etc etc) ____________________________________________________________ Prices, software, charts & analysis. Click here to open your online FX trading account. http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxUY6wmoDgUsiUDCwXCN5abLa JIQLZ38xkwgJeCGouC9H4xXv2NIzu/
