An interesting, and even kindly,  comment by William - who seems to agree with
my argument, but objects to a phrase that seems to present  a blatant
expression of bias.

So let me make one thing perfectly clear:

I freely admit that, ultimately, all  my judgments in art are unreasonably
biased, and I doubt whether anyone else's are not, even if they have been
academically, economically, and/or institutionally vetted.


When I write about art, I try to display my bias rather than hide it, and
feel there is something creepy ,  dishonest, or school-boyish  about those who
do not.


Regardless of the amazing variety of cultural artifacts available to us in the
modern world, we each have been shaped by the narrow circumstances of our
time, place, and family.

And I have to admit, that by some important criteria, my family circumstances
have been wackier than most. (although, by some other criteria, they were
quite normal)

BTW -- I have no ambitions to write for the New Yorker - and it's probably
only by freakish circumstance that my writing about art is now getting
published at all.



>The one thing wrong with Miller's comment is, again, his habit to insert his
bias in an otherwise ok sentence.  His term "ever-wackier" as a prefix to a
bland phrase "trends...." is deadly.  Readers know by this prefix that Miller
has an agenda, one that may distort his subject making his analysis useless.
Miller is essentially right when he refers to sociology.  The art world calls
it "cultural studies" and then refers to art as "visual culture" to signify
the
hugely expanded arena for art and art practice.

When Miller gets rid of those prefix adjectives that ruin the reasoning of
his
text, he may begin to think in the terms others can understand without
needing
to account for his unreasoned bias. For instance, re-read the first Miller
sentence above and subtract "ever-wackier" and you'll have a decent
proposition
(the implied broadening of art contexts) that can then be examined for its
value. But with the "ever-wackier" he makes an unsubstantiated claim and
tries
to establish an a-priori sentiment against the "trends of the postwar...".
wc

____________________________________________________________
Weight Loss Program
Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/c?cp=S6yYsiVGiv6TAxvkOxtP_wAAJz6c
l_zTaptgNR5c8Mer1v9kAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEUgAAAAA=

Reply via email to