Again are we talking statistics - more population more art - more art - more good art - yet in the same proportions And this does not explain why their is more of an audience for art - unless its just a question of more people larger audience
On 5/14/10 1:33 AM, "ARMANDO BAEZA" <[email protected]> wrote: NO, because there are more individual artist doing art, which improves the odds of "good"work, ________________________________ From: William Conger <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 9:24:17 PM Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) Because mass culture is art. wc ----- Original Message ---- From: ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 9:59:51 PM Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) there are many millions more people with the time and methods to see and enjoy all the arts, than ever before, and growing. AB ________________________________ From: William Conger <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 6:34:01 PM Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) For every gain there is a loss. Emerson. wc ----- Original Message ---- From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Thu, May 13, 2010 7:58:50 PM Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) The western tradition of art - which is change and speculation has not been lost - unless you think that the displacement of the romanesque by the renaissance represents the beginnings of a tradition of lost On 5/13/10 8:37 PM, "joseph berg" <[email protected]> wrote: Doesn't that apply to the lost recipe of "The Cherry Orchard"? And also to the traditions of art? -- --
