The main trouble I have with your comments is that they are polemical. Nothing backs them up except an appeal to your own authority. Real art? Cocktail conversation. I reply that there's no such thing as real art. Art is always maybe art, maybe not art. A way of questioning. wc
----- Original Message ---- From: Boris Shoshensky <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Sent: Sat, May 15, 2010 9:30:22 AM Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) Actually it is one of the dialectic laws - transition of quantity into quality, but I have doubts that more people do or care about real art nowadays. Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: "More good things in life are lost by indifference than ever were lost by active hostility." (Robert Gordon Menzies) Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 07:45:53 EDT In a message dated 5/14/10 1:33:49 AM, [email protected] writes: > NO, because there are more individual artist doing art, > which improves the odds of "good"work, > > > It doesn't improve the quality of anything else when millions start doing it too. Kate Sullivan
