"In this context Duchamp's creation of the
readymade...".

I think you meant Duchamp's use of a ready-made created before him.
Boris Shoshensky

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Saul Ostrow <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Let us try this instead
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:47:37 -0400

The shift away from traditional forms of art were also advanced in the early
half of the- 20th century, by not only technological and formal means, but
the
effect of philosophers, linguists and semioticians hypothesizing that the
relation of the lingual signifier to signified is arbitrary as they set about
to systematically explore our primary means of representation. The logical
conclusion drawn form this propositon is that beyond a certain category of
pictorial/ mimetic images and indexical signs we live in a world of
potentially endless signifiers. In this context Duchamp's creation of the
readymade is often art historically represented as a radical anti- art and
anti-aesthetic gesture meant to expose art's institutional existence, it
might
more likely reflect his awareness of the role that semiotics plays in art and
culture. In support of this proposition one need not forget that Duchamp's
production in varied media demonstrates that the readymade was just one
possibility form of signification, among a plethora of other possible
artistic
proposition focusing on the phenomenal (the optic machines) as well as the
assignment and layering of meaning (the Large Glass).

The artistic and theoretical investigations of the everyday in turn was not
only a consequence of  20th century modernism's heuristic and nihilist logic
applied to the question of what was essential to art as a system of
signification, but was part of an earlier tradition as well. In th e19th
Century groups of artists, writers, and poets had long met in cafis to
discuss
and engage in spontaneous performances of their work. In the  late19th
century
these casual get-togethers  were transformed into significant sites for group
entertainment, collaboration, and self-promotion - this was the birth of
Bohemia and its anti-establishment ethos premised on decadence. From this
cafe
society there arose such anti-art manifestations as Les Hydropathes
<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Les_Hydropathes&amp;action=edit&am
p;redlink=1><http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Les_Hydropathes&action
=edit&redlink=1> , which as a group and a journal existed around the period
1878-1881 and had ties to the Decadent and the Symbolists literary movements.
This gave rise to The Incoherents (and Les Arts Incohirents) another
short-lived French art movement founded by writer and publisher Jules Livy
<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jules_L%C3%A9vy&amp;action=edit&am
p;redlink=1><http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jules_L%C3%A9vy&action
=edit&redlink=1> in 1882, which anticipated  the nihilism of Futurism, Dada
and Surrealism.

The Incoherents presented work, which was deliberately irrational and
iconoclastic consisting of "found" art objects, the drawings of children, and
drawings "made by people who don't know how to draw." Livy exhibited an
all-black painting by poet Paul Bilhaud
<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Bilhaud&amp;action=edit&amp;r
edlink=1><http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paul_Bilhaud&action=edit&;
redlink=1>  called Negroes Fighting in a Cellar at Night. The early film
animator Imile Cohl
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89mile_Cohl><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%
C3%89mile_Cohl> contributed photographs, which would later be called surreal
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrealism><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrea
lism> . In an 1883 show, the artist Sapeck (Eughne Bataille)
<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eug%C3%A8ne_Bataille_%28Sapeck%29><http://fr.wi
kipedia.org/wiki/Eug%C3%A8ne_Bataille_%28Sapeck%29> ( contributed an
'augmented' Mona Lisa
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Li
sa> smoking a pipe. Although small and short-lived, the Incoherents were
certainly well-known. In October 1882, to view the exhibition entitled Arts
incohirents over two thousand curious invitees including many of the artist
associated with impressionism, and such celebrities as Richard Wagner and the
king of Bavaria crowded into Livy's Left Bank apartment, where they could see
Among other works  a relief painting of a postman from which protruded an
actual worn-out shoe, a landscape painted by a dancer from the Paris Opera on
a ballet slipper and a painting on a garlic sausage. By November 1883, the
Incoherents
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incoherents><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incoh
erents>  had become so big that an exhibit was arranged at the Vivienne
Gallery, open to the public. The exhibit accepted any and all entries, so
long
as they were not obscene or serious. The public was taken with the show, and
the profits were donated to public assistance. The movement wound down in the
mid 1890's.

In a more serious vein, the questioning of the  systemic potentiality of
art's
linguistic, formal, and phenomenal means is especially apparent in the
emergence and development of both the Bauhaus and the Russian Productivists -
whose employment of an industrial aesthetic coincided with their recognition
that art and design were rhetorical devices both form and content, which
could
be used to advance a model of daily life that was aesthetically utilitarian,
practical, and public. Though highly misrepresented as existing without
precedents and generally mis-understood, these avant-garde's utopian
projects,
which sought  to expand the notion of art in all directions or those like
that of Duchamps who incorporated everyday reality and social engagement into
art in  that they establish a tradition of alterity continue to exert
influence on contemporary culture. By the late 1950s, the appropriation of
every-day life by art led to what Allan Kaprow identified as the "blurring of
art and life." This process seems to culminate in 1960-70s with the
conceptualism, whose practices deploy a broad-range of nonrepresentational
and
aesthetic strategies - including activism, semiotics, political, social and
critical practices meant to transform into objects of self-reflective
deliberation subjective and collective situations and their conditions.

Reply via email to