Art is still a matter of individual or group taste, last time i checked. The subjects/objects/things/words/colors/sounds/forms etc,,or anything that is sensed still applies. Beauty and ugly still occupy the same space, separated only by the individual minds. These are conclusion reach by time,which may be baseless to all others.
AB From: William Conger <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, December 3, 2010 4:58:04 PM Subject: Re: "...A shift in aesthetic judgment that replaced the classical "this is beautiful" with "this is art"." What reasons do you have? It would help if you elaborated instead of just confirming or denying some view. wc ----- Original Message ---- From: ARMANDO BAEZA <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Fri, December 3, 2010 1:29:19 PM Subject: Re: "...A shift in aesthetic judgment that replaced the classical "this is beautiful" with "this is art"." Not so. Both still apply, but with a deeper understanding. The object continues to be expressed. Ab ________________________________ From: joseph berg <[email protected]> To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, December 3, 2010 12:45:20 AM Subject: "...A shift in aesthetic judgment that replaced the classical "this is beautiful" with "this is art"." http://cgi.ebay.com/Kant-After-Duchamp-NEW-Thierry-Duve-/150526996682
