That more or less proves my point. Paglia makes a rational, sensible statement. Schjeldahl makes a rational, sensible statement. But neither applies. Artists are in the paradoxical space between or beyond those views. They hold both views simultaneously and somehow, keep on working productively. wc
----- Original Message ---- From: joseph berg <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, November 17, 2012 1:10:48 PM Subject: Re: aesthetics Rant On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:42 AM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote: > ...Real artists doubt everything, > including their own work. > According to this recent article: - Culture maven Camille Paglia says that visual artists should take a page from starchitects<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444223104578034480670026450.html> and embrace the capitalist ideology that makes today's comforts possible. I think Paglia misunderstands artists. I once heard Peter Schjeldahl, art critic for *The New Yorker*, say that artists wouldn't make art if they didn't have a problem with the way the world works. The issue is not that artists are capitalism-hating Communists, it's that artists are *born against*. And capitalism happens to be the system at hand. http://www.architectmagazine.com/architecture/morning-roundup-november-15-2012.aspx
