and there's a good reason for that - though my thoughts at time may be
garbled they are my thoughts

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:46 PM, joseph berg <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:11 AM, William Conger <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > After the first sentence or so I was so bored by the article Berg points
> > to that
> > I gave up.  I thought that this is only a redux of John Dewey's
> > "progressive
> > education" philosophy, or learn by doing idea.  That was of course a good
> > idea
> > that was more or less the concept that later undergirded the Bauhaus
> > curriculum
> > and still inform the curricula of many schools world-wide.
> >
> > There are always several sides to any issue, including anything to do
> with
> > art.
> >  For instance, I like much of Jed Perl's writing because he is so good at
> > getting to the heart of the decadence of contemporary art while holding
> to
> > the
> > enduring ideals of high art. But I also like a lot of what his exact
> > counterpart, Jerry Saltz, writes as the reigning champion of low art and
> > popular
> > culture, the cutting rawness of vulgarity and of all things profane.
> >  Somewhere,
> > mixing the two together helps to locate the real condition of art -- and
> > of our
> > times.
> > The same dialectic is true when it comes to creativity.  The
> > free-experimentation with an eye on a goal or problem to solve is surely
> an
> > important aspect of creativity as is the intelligent and practiced use of
> > materials, tools, and rule-based methodologies.  That's really quite
> > elementary,
> > isn't it?
> >
> > Berg's insistent desire to raise one side up -- always the most
> > conservative
> > tradition-bound side --  and to push the other side down -- always the
> > irreverent tradition-bashing side -- reveals his aversion to the use of
> > dialectic which is necessary to any intellectual search for truth.
> >
> > Saul's idea that seems to claim many 'discourses about art' each one
> > embracing a
> > tradition and each one at some great or small odds with the others is
> > really a
> > plea for a highly developed dialectic and, to me, offers the best albeit
> > very
> > complex access to what the art of our times is really about.  It's a
> > multi-faceted dialectic.  I'd like to see Berg pay more attention to that
> > level
> > of thinking and much less attention to the daily deluge of journalistic
> > dumbed-down re-hashing of well known ideas, like John Dewey's.
> >
> > Let's go to the thick soup, not the watered down soup of the soup.
> > wc
> >
> > You always like HIM better than ME.
>
>


-- 
 S a u l   O s t r o w

*Critical  Voices*
21STREETPROJECTS
La    Table   Ronde
162 West 21 Street
NYC,    NY   10011

[email protected]
www.21stprojects.org

Reply via email to