On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:50 PM, William Conger <[email protected]>wrote:
> One of the ongoing debates has to do with the proper language for the U.S. > Constitution and Bill of Rights. Some people argue that if they were > translated > into another language and used in Court, there may be problems re > interpretation. This is an example of the issue re the mismatched > 'realities' > of different languages. > > > I think that the meaning of the word "commerce" had a broader meaning than it does today. We think of "commerce" today as limited to financial dealings but that was not the case 200+ years ago.
