It sounds like once "gig" arrives everyone else instantly trys to match it to 
save their customer base.
Then it sounds like it's a race to the bottom on price.
What is it the Meme says, prove me wrong?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matt Hoppes 
  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
  Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 6:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville


  I do t believe it is. First one to the customer with reasonable service 
levels and customer service and prices wins. 

  On Feb 9, 2019, at 6:52 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:


    Well, is it? Did AT&T beat Google to many of the homes?




    -----
    Mike Hammett
    Intelligent Computing Solutions

    Midwest Internet Exchange

    The Brothers WISP






----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
    To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
    Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 5:02:02 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville

    This an exception to that rule.


    Sent from my iPhone

    On Feb 9, 2019, at 1:46 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net> 
wrote:



      so is it safe to now assume "the first one with fiber" does not 
necessarily still win?

      obviously ATT got there first so i guess they won....

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Colin Stanners 
        To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
        Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 12:28 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville


        Microfiber works for cheaper/faster/temporary runs or as you said on 
private, controlled property. 


        On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 12:24 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com wrote:



          I think microfiber can work it is for the end-user hookup, and 
(probably) entirely on their property. However, for a main line, or even a 
trunk, it sounds like it's maybe just a bit too cheap. 


          --

          bp

          part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com





          On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:15 AM Matt Hoppes 
<mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

            I thought the whole issue of 2” deep was brought up when it started 
and was determined and said to be a non issue. 


            Either because no one would bother it or they would just rerun. 

            On Feb 9, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Chuck Hogg 
<ch...@allpointsbroadband.com> wrote:


              So here's why Google Fiber failed. 


              1.  Microtrenches were done as little as 2" in some areas.  When 
roads got resurfaced, they ate up Google Fiber.  Additionally, you could go 
down a road and see foam coming up in some areas.  Google Fiber contractors 
were not what I'd call first rate.  They were being pressured by the local 
project manager to get things completed fast.  Anyone in construction knows 
that means quality can go to shit.
              2.  Anytime a permit was pulled for Google Fiber microtrenching, 
AT&T owned the poles, so they deployed fiber within 2 weeks of a permit.  The 
work usually didn't commence for a month and by that time, AT&T had went 
through and signed up a bunch of customers.  So Google Fiber take rate was not 
very high as AT&T built faster than them.  AT&T project managers were given an 
"unlimited" budget to beat Google Fiber on every project.  Spectrum would also 
upgrade those same areas to latest DOCSIS technology to deploy gigabit speeds 
as well.
              3.  Lots of promises and not a lot delivered.  They know the 
plant does not have a long term life and don't feel like fixing things.  So now 
the city has to deal with it for the time to come.


              That sad part is that a lot of my friends have it where it is 
available to them.  They like it a lot and don't want to go back to 
AT&T/Spectrum.


              On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 12:20 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

                Sure enough. But if it doesn't get USA attention, you may be 
doing a lot of repairs. Sounds like that's what Google discovered. 


                --

                bp

                part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com





                On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:15 AM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> 
wrote:

                  I recently got a quote from a contractor for microtrenching.  
$12/foot asphalt repair, duct and handholes included.  Cheaper than boring.  

                  From: Colin Stanners 
                  Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 10:01 AM
                  To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
                  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville

                  From the article: The tech giant acknowledged problems in 
Louisville with a new method of digging shallower trenches to speed up the 
installation times of the fiber optic cable. Google says the problems were 
"disruptive to residents and caused service issues for our customers."


                  Sounds like they tried microtrenching and then discovered its 
limitations, or how little city/construction crews worry about hitting fiber 
when it's at pretty much street level/directly in their work area.


                  On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

                    And an unlimited supply of money does not help.  Slow and 
careful on a limited budget does work.  Many on this list can prove it.  

                    From: Bill Prince 
                    Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2019 9:38 AM
                    To: AFMUG 
                    Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Google fiber bailing on Louisville


                    Yet another confirmation that it's not as easy as it looks.

                    
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/googles-high-speed-internet-pulling-220020962.html


                    --

                    bp

                    part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


------------------------------------------------------------
                    -- 
                    AF mailing list
                    AF@af.afmug.com
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                    -- 
                    AF mailing list
                    AF@af.afmug.com
                    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------
                  -- 
                  AF mailing list
                  AF@af.afmug.com
                  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


                  -- 
                  AF mailing list
                  AF@af.afmug.com
                  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

                -- 
                AF mailing list
                AF@af.afmug.com
                http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com





              -- 

              Regards, 
              Chuck
              -- 
              AF mailing list
              AF@af.afmug.com
              http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

            -- 
            AF mailing list
            AF@af.afmug.com
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

          -- 
          AF mailing list
          AF@af.afmug.com
          http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------


        -- 
        AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      AF@af.afmug.com
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to