Mike, Any idea how to get QinQ VLANs + a couple other non QinQ VLANs to trunk between two ignite switches? For the life of me I can't make it work. Per their manual it is switchport dot1q-tunnel mode uplink On one switch and then the upstream switch is just a trunk port allowing that SVLAN but it doesn't work. Works fine for one switch connected to a Siklu, but trying to connect a second switch to the first switch and getting it to pass the SVLAN just won't work. (like their example around page 529)
Also tried just making them regular trunk ports (since we run a second 0x8100 tag) but that doesn't work either. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:59 PM Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Try a Mikrotik switch if you think the IgniteNet is bad. > > I had no problem figuring out VLANs on IgniteNet. *shrugs* > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com> > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 9, 2019 11:42:44 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] SFP Switch recomendation > > We are using a few Ignite fusion fiber switches. Big complaint is that > there is some strange incompatibility with 844GEs where it will sometimes > cause the 844GE to reset its WAN VLAN settings if the ignite switch gets > power cycled. Not sure if this has anything to do with ignite, but it > doesn't happen with any other switch we have tried. > > VLAN settings are also mind bogglingly stupid. It can do most things > except adding two tags, but the way it is configured makes zero sense. > > Power/heat and dimensions are all good. > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:23 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> We primarily use the HP Procurve J9803A (I think theyre called Office >> Connect or something now) With LACP for bonding our 2+0 SAF links. We have >> a site going in that will have three bonded links so I need at least 6 SFP. >> The new name of these also changed the corm factor, theyre deeper and wont >> fit in some of our enclosures. >> >> We dont do much with our switches beyond VLAN and LACP. >> >> Whats a comparable option with the less then 10 inch depth but still >> rackmount that wont take issue with HP LACP on the other side of the link >> if that matters? Ive heard good/bad on the mikrotik switches. These >> currently only need up to 2gbps aggregate, but that will probably change >> over time. Im not opposed to full SFP, but on our CCR we have a coup SFP >> gigabit copper that are flaky, I dont know if thats a mikrotik thing or a >> copper SFP thing >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > *PORT NETWORKS* > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707 > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Carl Peterson *PORT NETWORKS* 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 637-3707
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
