It would mitigate looped SM's. I use to prevent broadcast like rogue DHCP server and Mikrotik Discovery.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:55 AM Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com> wrote: > Would this be beneficial to put, say, all APs on a tower to the same > horizon value to help mitigate looped SMs? > > > > Vlad > > > On 9/7/2019 9:40 PM, Louis Arsenault wrote: > > I believe what you are looking for is split horizon. > https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:MPLSVPLS#Split_horizon_bridging > Essentially "The basic idea of split horizon bridging is to make traffic > arriving over some port never be sent out some set of ports" > So ports that are in the same bridge group and you do not want traffic > forwarded between them then set the horizon value all the same. > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 8:44 PM Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: > >> We are having a network problem. >> >> >> >> I have a bridge at a tower that has a bunch of VLANs on it (going up the >> tower on fiber to a Fiber/POE switch. I have each AP on a separate VLAN, >> but all VLANs are in the "LANBridge". I am having an AP acting up and want >> to separate communication between the VLAN's on that bridge >> >> I could enable IP Firewall on that bridge, but I don't know what the >> Firewall rules would be for it to isolate the interfaces (VLANs) on the >> bridge >> >> >> >> >> >> *Paul McCall, President * >> >> *Florida Broadband / PDMNet* >> >> *658 Old Dixie Highway* >> >> *Vero Beach, FL 32962* >> >> *772-564-6800* >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > > > -- > -Louis > > NTInet > O: 803-533-1660 X 207 > C: 803-997-0004 > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- -Louis NTInet O: 803-533-1660 X 207 C: 803-997-0004
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
