Mr Hoppes, I know the XD is more spectruly efficient, power efficient, etc.
But Mr Howard said the the older 5X was better in some ways the the XD and
I am curious as to what aspects he is talking about.

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:13 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:

> HD is more spectrally efficient.
>
> On Apr 21, 2020, at 10:05 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> How is a AF5X better than the AF5XHD? I'm curious as to what ways you
> mention. So far the only way i have found is the SNMP OID's are totally
> screwed up and not functioning in the HD version.
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 7:34 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ehh... the AirFiber 5x is a good radio. If it's a new link, or replacing
>> both ends, then the Airfiber 5xHD is generally a pretty good replacement.
>> The HD is better than the old 5x in some ways, and a bit worse in other
>> ways, but they're both good radios.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:32 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I told guy who needs them to get some Cambium higher end radios...
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 4:07 PM Matt Hoppes <
>>> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ubiquiti really needs to realize they screwed the pooch by stopping
>>>> production on that product.
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 21, 2020, at 5:22 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <IMG_3622.jpg>
>>>> Here’s what we’ve got.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:59 PM Jaime Solorza <
>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ok.  Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020, 2:35 PM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jamie,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we have a decommissioned pair in our storage.  I’ll go look
>>>>>> later today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Sean
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:31 PM Jaime Solorza <
>>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We need an older model AirFiber5x...
>>>>>>> Any one know where we can get one? Thanks, El Dude
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to