I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of actual usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with them on the rest...
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP at > 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two transmit > frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require couplers and > associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any attempt to stack an > 80 and a 40 to get a 120 MHz block in order to “cover” the band for an ETSI > 112 MHz bandwidth radio configuration would be strictly illegal in North > America, and any single transmitter bandwidth greater than 80 MHz bandwidth > (11 GHz) is likewise illegal. > >> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: >> >> 11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per >> polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available. >> Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and he >> will try to make it happen. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:36 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Jon, >>> >>> I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz >>> channels per TX side? >>> >>> TJ >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>>> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX. >>>> >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What band can you do 120mhz in? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all >>>>>> the same >>>>>> >>>>>> Jon Langeler >>>>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie >>>>>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's >>>>>>>> called a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The >>>>>>>>> Bridgewave has some other magic. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie >>>>>>>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core >>>>>>>>>> version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, >>>>>>>>>> probably in part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the >>>>>>>>>> Navigator. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput >>>>>>>>>>> (~3Gbps if you have the channels available). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each >>>>>>>>>>> capable of ~1.4Gbps. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie >>>>>>>>>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat >>>>>>>>>>>> WTM4200 vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Jason >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
