He shouldn't. Nobody should. There are idiots everywhere. I don't think
abortion is a great idea, laying aside the whole rights thing. I just don't
think it is a great mental health decision for most mothers. Having said
that, I also think that any doctor that chooses to perform abortions should
be as safe as any other citizen as long as it is legal. Clinics that allow
it should be safe and not blown up.

You have left leaning idiots killing people, right leaning idiots killing
people. I think us idiots in the middle are just too apathetic to go to the
trouble to kill anyone. It just takes far too much effort.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 10:10 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Why? Why would a proven expert on pandemics have to fear for his family's
> safety?
>
>
> https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEIGp2DZDmBNzMbRqY69yWQwqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow2Nb3CjDivdcCMJ_d7gU?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 7:59 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> Please carefully parse what I said.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2020, at 7:21 PM, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Sorry I should call Lent, but ignoring his quoting and spreading the
>> nut case doctor talking about hydrotoxic as the cure for coronavirus cannot
>> be ignored or swept under the rug as "flubing" his advisors or the fiasco
>> of using bleach and suggesting it's investigation for use.   Chuck you are
>> a hero of mine but siding with what is clearly an idiot diminishes you.   I
>> admire you too much to see you defend him, it just hurts.
>>
>> On 8/5/20 3:49 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>
>> I watched the whole interview.  It was not the unmitigated disaster the
>> laft clams.  He is not very good at speaking off the cuff about things that
>> can be refuted, but the things he said were, for the most part, literally
>> true if you parse the sentence.
>>
>> Of course he does not have a filter and doesn’t care who he offends with
>> thoughtless remarks.  But if you take the stuff he said sentence by
>> sentence, word by word there are legit, logical and true explanations.  The
>> problem is he parrots and regurgitates things his advisors tell him but he
>> flubs them up in the retelling.  I actually got a kick out of them talking
>> over each other.  I would have had a bit more respect for the president if
>> I was interviewing them but obviously these two have a history and enjoy
>> the jousting.
>>
>> He was pretty uncaring about John Lewis, but if John Lewis snubbed him at
>> the inauguration and state of the unions, if John Lewis really had a deep
>> dislike for Trump, it is not surprising that Trump didn’t have much
>> personal knowledge of the guy.  When asked if Lewis was impressive (not
>> sure the exact wording) Trump essentially said “I don’t know, others seem
>> to think so”.  That is not Trump saying Lewis was not impressive or
>> discounting his accomplishments, but that is how it was interpreted by some
>> news outlets.
>>
>> It seems we have a bunch of 13 year olds that summarize current events
>> and create headlines.  They lack the ability, or tenacity or authority to
>> attempt to report exactly what has been said, rather they just report the
>> worst possibly way you can take/spin a statement.  On both sides.
>>
>> You see an inflammatory head line, look at the story and see the
>> reactionary summary and then go actually read or view the source and it is
>> never as bad.
>>
>> But if it bleeds it leads.  Not much has changed there.  Newspaper
>> articles 200 years ago were doing the exact same thing to political
>> enemies.  Even worse as far as slander and libel.
>>
>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 4:31 PM
>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: ideas?
>>
>> Don't start...I'll post Axios interview from most inept president ever.
>> What an embarrassment.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 4:23 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Antifa laser.
>>>
>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 3:02 PM
>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT: ideas?
>>>
>>> Person behind holding the object. Debunked
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:55 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like a mirage to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/5/2020 1:47 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ha...my friend is analyzing it...he has cool toys and software plus
>>>> expertise.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:02 PM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That’s what covid looks like in the wild.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2020 1:52 PM
>>>>> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT: ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> Intriguing...not a lens flare
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>> --
>>>>> AF mailing list
>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> AF mailing list
>>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to