Are you running automatic power back off? Or target signal level?
> On Nov 11, 2020, at 8:41 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Since the top end costs 5 and 6 figures I'm ok putting SAF and AF11 in the > same bracket. > > > > On 11/11/2020 8:37 AM, Josh Baird wrote: >> Aviat links "aren't SAF latency?" What latency are you seeing on your >> WTM4200 vs SAF links? I wouldn't expect it to be much different in ideal >> circumstances. >> >> I wouldn't call them "low cost" either. When I think "low cost," I think >> AF11X. >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:42 AM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> We have been putting up a handful of 11ghz links lately and are running out >>> of available channels in a relatively small footprint. We are limited to 5 >>> to 8 miles because of antenna size limits. Grain legs wont support large >>> than 3 foot antennas and many are to sketchy to go above 2 foot. Most of >>> our rooftop locations wont support larger than 3 foot >>> ballast/tray/equipment weight and none of our leases on rooftops allow >>> anything other than nprm. >>> Have we shot ourselves in the foot? Are 5 mile licensed links frowned upon? >>> We are really digging the wtm4200 aviat (they're not SAF latency) but they >>> meet our demand, price is right and support is good. But I'm wondering if >>> low cost radios got us greedy and spectrum rude. >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
