2+0 Co-Polarization will add couplers and losses on each end, and I believe 
that LinkPlanner automatically puts those in when you specify this. With the 
Aviat WTM, you would be using the WTM-42C (coupler version) which has the 
coupler losses baked-in to the specs.


> On Jan 4, 2021, at 2:51 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> 
> Probably, LinkPlanner is pretty smart.
> I assume you don't want to use 2 antennas.
> There are some licensed radios now that I think can do 2 x 80 MHz channels in 
> a single core, like from Aviat or SIAE maybe, I don't know if this gets 
> around the splitter cost and performance issues.  I may have that feature 
> completely wrong, I haven't looked into it.  There could also be a 
> performance hit by using the same xmt power amp for 160 MHz.
> I also haven't checked out the full feature set of the new PTP850C, the only 
> thing I know it has is SFP+.
> 
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 1/4/2021 1:30:45 PM
> To: af@af.afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar
> 
> Ok yeah, the Link Planner BOM shows some splitters.  I wonder if Link 
> Planner already accounted for the additional losses when I selected "Co 
> Polar" on the dropdown.
> 
> 
> On 1/4/2021 2:25 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>> I seem to remember that different channel different polarization is the 
>> best, if your radio manufacturer charges for an XPIC license key.  Next best 
>> is XPIC.  And that the problem with different channel same polarization is 
>> you need a splitter which costs several dB of system gain.  But that's from 
>> memory, and mine is not so reliable.
>> 
>> ---- Original Message ----
>> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: 1/4/2021 1:16:26 PM
>> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group" <af@af.afmug.com>
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 2+0 Co-Polar
>> 
>> I'm looking at a path where the coordinator can get me two 50mhz XPIC
>> channels, or two 80mhz H-Pol channels.
>> 
>> I've never installed co-polar.  Do you need a lot of extra junk to make
>> that work?
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to