Lots of cheap used stuff out there.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 1, 2021, at 11:06 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> It's 5 digit numbers, however you choose to label it.
> 
> The good news is one box will scale to staggering amounts of traffic.
> 
> 
> 
>> On 3/1/2021 1:03 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>> Corvette money. Is that anything like cubic dollars?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>> On 3/1/2021 9:51 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> CGNAT on Juniper requires an IP services card.  With licensing it's like 
>>> Corvette money.
>>> 
>>> ....but that's kinda where we're at isn't it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/1/2021 12:36 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
>>>> I gave up the first time they asked me to record data for them during an 
>>>> instance and wanted us to let it hang and collect data.
>>>>  
>>>> I was like no, not going to do that.
>>>>  
>>>> And then started removing 1072 connection tracking altogether from my 
>>>> network.
>>>>  
>>>> For the time being I’m using 1036 for CGNAT as a transition, then will 
>>>> head to CHR CGNAT, then Juniper.
>>>>  
>>>> I agree that Mikrotik just isn’t focused on the 1072 anymore and this 
>>>> particular issue seems beyond them to repair.
>>>>  
>>>> Which makes the 1072 a no starter for anything conn track for us ever 
>>>> again.
>>>>  
>>>> I’ve got one 2004 doing the CGNAT now, and it’s on latest Stable release.
>>>> Watching to see if it bails too, or is capable of doing it for the time 
>>>> being.
>>>>  
>>>> But our end game it MPLS/VPLS and/or direct switch VLAN type segmentation 
>>>> of layer2 into our cores where we will do all of the heavy lifting.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Steven Kenney
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:03 AM
>>>> To: af <af@af.afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Official Limitations
>>>>  
>>>> Still fighting with Mikrotik about the 1072 reboots.  New hardware didn't 
>>>> fix it, had several people check the configs all were good. After 2 months 
>>>> of going back and forth, escalating to a higher tier tech...   I 
>>>> officially got a response that 1 million connections is too much for the 
>>>> 1072 and I should expect it to reboot and not function properly.  That was 
>>>> their conclusion.  Even though all of the 72 processors are under 50%,  
>>>> memory usage is only about 20% etc.  Turn off connection tracking is the 
>>>> their solution.  
>>>>  
>>>> How about those apples?  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>          
>>>> STEVEN KENNEY 
>>>> DIRECTOR OF GLOBAL CONNECTIVITY & CONTINUITY A: 158 Erie St. N | 
>>>> Leamington ON 
>>>> E: st...@wavedirect.org | P: 519-737-9283
>>>> W: www.wavedirect.net
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to