They're both brand new SFPs provided by Aviat. I guess if they have terrible quality control that could be the issue. That solution would make a lot more sense to me if it were just one end seeing the issues. I may have to at least attempt it if nothing else works, however.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:42 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > replace the sfp on both radios > or use the copper port to rule out the latency coming from the rf > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's >> Ethernet link? What model of MT router? >> >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 1:20 PM Jason McKemie < >> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm having an issue where about 3-8% of packets going through a WTM4200 >>> link are seeing a 1-10ms spike in latency. Aviat support is not being >>> particularly helpful, they just say they're seeing CRC errors at one end >>> and to replace the SFPs and cabling to see if that helps. These have a >>> fiber connection and are powered through the DC port. The radios / SFPs / >>> fiber at both ends are new. I've already replaced the SFPs on the attached >>> Mikrotik routers with Aviat SFPs with no change in the issue. >>> Incidentally, I'm seeing the issue when I ping from the Mikrotik routers to >>> their respectively attached WTM - so the issue is both ends and not a >>> single one. Has anyone seen anything like this? >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
