It took a lot of faith in forrest to do this. There was no magic smoke On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 11:00 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) < li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> The 450m 3ghz ignores any power on the port so it is perfectly safe to > provide PoE+sync to the radio. The power needs to be there to ensure > reliable transmission of the sync signal. > > So yes, use that board, provide either +48v or -48V on that port, and > the radio will be perfectly happy to get sync from the ethernet port while > getting its power from the power port. > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023, 8:04 PM lists gogebicrange.net < > li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote: > >> I would think this has been covered in the past but I >> didn’t find it with a search of my old emails so… >> >> >> >> When working with the 450m 3ghz AP’s , powering with DC and carrying data >> on ethernet. How does one provide sync from a Packetflux RackInjector? I >> assume that you just provide it with the most modern card they are offering >> (*Power Injection for Cambium Sync Board) **by sending the POE + sync up >> the ethernet data cable that is already in use. BUT I don’t want to send a >> POE up that cable since the 3ghz wont power over ethernet and the unit is >> already DC powered without asking. * >> >> >> >> *Is anyone using Packetflux RackInjector to provide the sync on the 3ghz >> APs with this configuration?* >> >> >> >> *Thank,* >> >> *Brandon* >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
