Ya 700 is a bit much.  Really depends on how many changes you have at one time. 
 I have multiple books on OSPF, some state 80 is too many and others state 150, 
and so on.  So there is no definitive rule on it.  Really depends on how 
quickly you want it to converge.  Keep in mind, there is not an issue with 
having MUTPLE backbone areas, just need to segment it accordingly and then put 
static routes between them.

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of castarritt
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 1:17 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik 1072 watchdog reboot bug

We are up to over 700 in a single area and it is starting to take more than 
just a few seconds for it to reconverge after a change, thinking it might be 
time to change things.

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:17 AM Dennis Burgess 
<dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote:
We have customers with a bit over 200 in one area.  Really not how many devices 
you have, it depends on how many state changes you have normally.  That network 
is VERY stable, a lot of fiber, so it works well.

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of 
castarritt
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:38 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik 1072 watchdog reboot bug

How many routes are you running over OSPF?

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 9:34 AM Steven Kenney via AF 
<af@af.afmug.com<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>> wrote:
Try pushing a total of 20+Gbps, and probably more if you combine all the ports. 
 I'm not talking about running normally. I've run OSPF without an update for up 
to a year without a crash.   I'm talking when you need to make major changes to 
the structure of your area, add or remove p2p connections etc.   It tends not 
to like that at least on RO6 and the 1072.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:00 AM Dennis Burgess 
<dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>> wrote:
We have had ospf on routers running 5+ gig of traffic with uptimes of over 200 
days without issues. I can name a few customers that had or have those.  Just a 
FYI.


[LTI-Full_175px]
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCSE, HE IPv6 Sage, Cambium ePMP Certified
Author of "Learn RouterOS- Second Edition”
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270  Website: 
http://www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Need to Automate MikroTik Backups:  https://cloud.linktechs.net
Create Wireless Coverage’s with 
www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com>

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf Of 
Steven Kenney via AF
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 1:18 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com<mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Cc: Steven Kenney <st...@wavedirect.org<mailto:st...@wavedirect.org>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik 1072 watchdog reboot bug

OSPF will also kill the system and force a watchdog reboot.  If I remove a a 
long time link between routers sure enough the router will reboot itself a 
couple days later.  Anything OSPF when it comes to removing existing rules (if 
you have enough going on)  it will die.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:05 PM Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
Then why did mine have a kernel panic when there is no connection tracking?  
Why is it solved with significantly more traffic and only changing the firewall?

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:46 AM Trey Scarborough 
<t...@3dsc.co<mailto:t...@3dsc.co>> wrote:

Its a known hardware issue with connection tracking enabled and hardware 
offload. It has a hard limit to the number of connections it supports that is 
pretty low. Its high enough you won't notice till you get significant traffic, 
but low enough it is a common issue. The fix is to turn off connection tracking 
I know this isn't the best solution, but its the only one that works. This and 
the hardware availability of the processor are the reason they are 
discontinued. The good news is that moving over to the newer generation seems 
to resolve this, but comes with a handful of version 7 quirks.
On 4/11/2023 5:55 PM, Alex Kessler wrote:

Been experiencing this bug for years while running NAT and connection tracking. 
 Rebooting every few months while running v6 latest.  Does v7 have any known 
fixes to resolve these watchdog reboots?





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------




From: "Colin Stanners" < cstanners at gmail.com<http://gmail.com> >
To: "af" < af at af.afmug.com<http://af.afmug.com> >
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 12:59:09 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 1072 Frustrations

This last year, I've seen a MikroTik CCR1072 switch from long being rock-solid 
to now having occasional random reboots (from watchdog) or 100% CPU usage, 
which strangles the BGP process. In the latter case, tools->profile would show 
the firewall taking 100% of CPU, even after temporarily disabling all firewall 
filter and NAT rules and connection tracking. Not fun.

MT tech support did not seem super helpful or interested, mostly recommending 
to disable watchdog (unacceptable on a production router) or to upgrade 
firmware (without specifying the suspected cause of the problem or nature of 
the fix).

Tried 1 update, that didn't seem to help, have now tried another...

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020, 11:38 PM Steven Kenney < steve at 
wavedirect.org<http://wavedirect.org> > wrote:
MIkrotik has been rock solid for me for years. Until this year and the 1072's. 
Random reboots set off by watchdog timer on all of my 1072's. Some more than 
others. Threads in the forum all discuss the same problem exactly. Its a 
connection tracking issue.. however I need connection tracking on one 
particular router. I've adjusted everything I could. Firmware and board 
firmware all up to date etc. Happens randomly with low levels of traffic, high 
levels of traffic, sometimes a couple times a day, sometimes weeks. No DDOS 
evidence at all from upstream routers. Configs checked and rechecked by third 
party experts. I graph everything about the Mikrotik and there are no clues or 
anything abnormal happening before the crash. Plenty of memory, disk space, CPU 
etc. Replaces all the trannies, power cables and such. Not running BGP only 
OSPF on the one that is giving me the most trouble.

Even have a serial console cable plugged into them to my opengear and set it to 
log pretty much everything to console including the kernel and nothing. A hard 
freeze.

Then there is Mikrotik support... I've never needed their support before until 
now. So I put a ticket in and the shitty attitude I'm getting from them seems 
like they KNOW there is something wrong with the hardware and they are 
intentionally not being helpful. It is pretty clear to see with all the people 
reporting this issue that there IS an issue.

If this is any indication of how things are going to go with Mikrotik on the 
newer hardware going forware I think its time to jump to an enterprise level 
system. Juniper most likely. Shame because they are just about keeping up with 
the demands with their hardware. Getting closer to 100Gbps etc and ROS7 ... but 
at their current pace I think we've outgrew them.

All the threads discussing this issue has been absolutely quiet when it comes 
to Mikrotik jumping in to mention or try to help troubleshoot. I think they 
know they had bad hardware out there and do not want to honor warranties. I've 
heard rumors of bad batches of 1072's.

Anyone else encounter this?
--
Alex
Alex Kessler / TECHNICAL OPERATIONS CENTER
O (Ohio) 740.212.3773 / O (All other markets) 888.966.5690 / 145 Columbus Rd, 
Athens, OH 45701 / 
point-broadband.com<https://imsva91-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fpoint%2dbroadband.com&umid=A4772EF7-F92F-C305-8A64-355EA9EC368A&auth=079c058f437b7c6303d36c6513e5e8848d0c5ac4-fe3b55e5fe3ba8bc5ee37cd86d2cae60857eca5a>

--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication, including any attachments, is 
intended only for the use of the addressee(s) to this email and is 
confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or acting on behalf of an 
intended recipient, any review, disclosure, conversion to hard copy, 
dissemination, reproduction or other use of any part of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error or without 
authorization, please notify the originator immediately and remove it from your 
system.


NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY This communication, including any attachments, is 
intended only for the use of the addressee(s) to this email and is 
confidential. If you are not an intended recipient or acting on behalf of an 
intended recipient, any review, disclosure, conversion to hard copy, 
dissemination, reproduction or other use of any part of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error or without 
authorization, please notify the originator immediately and remove it from your 
system.
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com<mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to