The Nanobeam M5-400s do work nicely. I have done a bunch of links in a dense downtown core, with the RF armor shield kits they stay consistently in MCS15 (64QAM 5/6 code rate) 99.9% of the time. 20 MHz channel = 112 Mbps traffic flow from the ubnt built in speed test one direction, assuming a primarily downstream traffic pattern. About 115-120 Mbps from router gigE ports to router gigE port when not putting any load on the ubnt device's CPU.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Rory Conaway via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > I’ve got 400’s and they work great. Mostly replacing Nanobridges and > using them for PTP with 10 and 20MHz channels where I don’t need DFS. > Can’t use 500’s yet, firmware still needs some TLC. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+rory=triadwireless....@afmug.com] *On > Behalf Of *timothy steele via Af > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:56 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] NanoBeam5 -400 Performance > > > > Anyone using NanoBeam5 400/500's Connecting to RocketM5 Sectors? > > what Firmware are you using and what performance are you seeing? > > > > Thanks, >
