Ahem. They sell in the US so they must follow the rules Just saying Jaime Solorza On Sep 24, 2014 1:48 PM, "Josh Reynolds via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote:
> MT isn't based in the US. Also there was that whole thing with > compliance test and Iran... > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > On 09/24/2014 10:34 AM, Kurt Fankhauser via Af wrote: > > MT gear is all uncertified isnt it? Why is the FCC cracking down so muxh > on UBNT but not MT? > > Sent from my iPhone > > Kurt Fankhauser > Wavelinc Communications > P.O. Box 126 > Bucyrus, OH 44820 > http://www.wavelinc.com > tel. 419-562-6405 > fax. 419-617-0110 > > On Sep 24, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > MT doesn't really give two "sheets" about the FCC. > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > On 09/24/2014 05:37 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af wrote: > > I can't get over the small gain MT uses. > > It also bugs me that the FCC seems to be all about massive amps and small > antennas rather than the reverse. > > If it was actually about interference PTP shots with narrow beamwidth is > preferred. I suppose it is too much to ask for those in our government that > set the regulations to actually understand the tech they're regulating. > > I suppose it could be the manufacturers are going with big amps and small > antennas, but it seems that would cost more. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:33 AM > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > The SXT antenna were always too weak. Give me 25 dBi or give me death. > Well, okay, I don't feel that strongly. I just won't buy it if not. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Stefan Englhardt via Af" <af@afmug.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:30:07 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > We’re starting the move to .ac with MT now. The 922UAGS-5HPacD has the > same dimensions as > > the 911/411 Boards so we just replace boards. > > > > We get good results with Mars Antennas with housing for P2P. The > SXT-Antennas are to weak for .ac. > > The 19db Mars Antennas give good CPE/short range PTP with a small > footprint. We use these as > > Sector-Antennas where we have to cover small areas. > > > > The .ac firmware adaption is quite new but we see stable results in the > 300-400 Mbit/s range for short links. > > The .ac boards have faster CPUs so they may increase 11n-Speeds/NAT > Performance. > > The 922-Board has a SFP. Ethernetport has moved. Due to this the > RFElements Stationbox XL do not fit. > > > > MT .ac does PTP and PTMP and is downward compatible to older boards with > 11n/a. > > > > SXTs with .ac are not stable with the latest sw-release. So as always with > MT you’ve to betatest > > HW/FW-combination to get it running smooth. > > > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+ste=genias....@afmug.com > <af-bounces+ste=genias....@afmug.com>] *Im Auftrag von *Rory Conaway via > Af > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 24. September 2014 14:26 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > > > Yeeeeaaaaa, I don’t’ think so. If you use Ubiquiti you pretty much know > what works and what doesn’t. in reality, you use as few custom features > as possible outside 802.11 compatibility and limit the radios to Layer 2 > bridges or nothing more than NAT whenever possible. Try not to use any of > the customer features although AirMax seems to be working pretty well. > You just don’t want to add anything that adds to processor overhead on an > AP for Rocket M5’s if you have a higher density. When the Titanium’s > tanked a couple years ago, there was a huge hole in any kind of AP product > with the ability to handle density due to the processor but nobody filled > it. It still hasn’t been filled to my satisfaction meaning we aren’t > replacing Rocket 5M’s any time soon and we are keeping them at 50 users or > less for another few months. However, NetFlix and video streaming means we > are pushing that down to a planned 30 over the next couple of months. That > numbers are just estimates but somewhere between 30-50 under heavy video > streaming usage and AirMax will start causing issues. > > > > If you allow torrents or anything that opens up a massive number of > connections, then the number of users per AP drops significantly which is > why we run filtering on the back end to reduce that. I’ve seen APs with > less than 30 go apoplectic with a couple of wild torrent users. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+rory=triadwireless....@afmug.com > <af-bounces+rory=triadwireless....@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *That One > Guy via Af > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:47 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > > > :-) the ubntboys tend to not be all that informed they blindly swear by > whatever the spec sheets and feature notices tell them > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Josh Reynolds via Af <af@afmug.com> > wrote: > > For the first question, I have no idea, since the only released radios are > PtP at this time. Pretty hard to tell. > > For the second one, "ubntboys" (at least the informed ones) don't run > airsync, because they know it doesn't work well. :) > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > > On 09/23/2014 09:06 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: > > does it work? or does it work in ubntboys eyes like airsync? > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af <af@afmug.com> > wrote: > > For clarification for EVERYBODY reading this post, ALL AIRMAX AC PRODUCTS > HAVE AIRMAX OFFLOADING :) > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > > On 09/23/2014 07:33 PM, Mathew Howard via Af wrote: > > The ptp-lites do have airmax offloading? I thought they didn't... > > We've had a link running for awhile, but it's got some noise issues, so it > hasn't really been the best place to test these... that said, they've been > running fine without any real problems that I've noticed. > � > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Af [af-bounces+mathew=litewire....@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh > Reynolds via Af [af@afmug.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:49 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > ptp lites are missing the internal shielding (i think?) as well as > airprism tech > > they do have airmax offloading, but it's also a brand new product line... > some bugs are showing in the software > > Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer > SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com > > On 09/23/2014 06:48 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote: > > These are basically beta release hardware? its missing some guts? > > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Rory Conaway via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > I don�t have one but from what I�m reading, it�s not quite ready for > primetime.� I�m waiting. > > � > > Rory > > � > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-bounces+rory=triadwireless....@afmug.com] *On > Behalf Of *TJ Trout via Af > *Sent:* Monday, September 22, 2014 6:39 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] rocket ac lite performance > > � > > How are the rocket AC's performing for you guys? Throughput? Bugs? > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > > > > > > -- > > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 > > > >
