I've yet to see this on outgoing.

Regards,
Chuck

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

>   Yeah, I’m just saying ISPs that provide 25M, 100M, 1000M connections to
> the home, especially symmetric ones, will need plans to deal with customers
> who are maxing out their upstream bandwidth with malicious traffic
> (probably without knowing it).  Sure, you can stream 8K video of your cats
> to the world from your Google Fiber connection.  But if it’s 1 Gbps of DDoS
> attack traffic, Google is going to have to detect it and stop it at the
> source.  Now one residential customer has the same firepower that
> previously only an ISP or a server at a datacenter or a government
> researcher had access to.  It’s like giving military surplus rocket
> launchers to local police, there is going to be misuse, even without bad
> intent.
>
>
>  *From:* Josh Reynolds via Af <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 05, 2014 2:56 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Mac based botnet
>
>  Maybe, but those home routers are just as easily exploited and are
> hard-wired.
>
> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
> On 10/05/2014 06:53 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af wrote:
>
>  Something I’m not sure ISPs have faced up to, is that home PCs are
> starting to have good enough Internet connections to be valuable as bots.
> Bad guys used to target those Linux servers partly because they were at
> datacenters with lots of upstream bandwidth.  But you don’t need a lot of
> home PCs on Google Fiber to create a botnet capable of a formidable DDoS
> attack.  The limiting factor might be home WiFi.
>
>
>  *From:* Paul Stewart via Af <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 05, 2014 9:38 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Mac based botnet
>
>
> Yeah probably not even 1% … Mac’s are no more immune than Linux is …
> speaking of, I’m amazed by how many linux admin’s don’t keep their systems
> patched.  That number is hacked linux servers is way way higher than 1% I
> would be confident…..
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Eric Muehleisen via Af
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 05, 2014 10:07 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - Mac based botnet
>
>
>
> Who said Macs were immune? 17k is hardly cause for panic. What is that,
> less than 1% affected?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
> So much for the belief that Macs are immune to malware.
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/10/reddit-powered-botnet-infected-thousands-of-macs-worldwide/
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to