Yeah, that's how you'd do it.
But I think I'm going to move to this instead:
10.0.0.1/30 = R1 (BHM gateway)
10.0.0.2/29 = BHM
10.0.0.3 & 4 = not used
10.0.0.5/29 = BHS
10.0.0.6/30 = R2 (BHS gateway)
Notice the BHs are on a /29 mask. That would let you ping, run
speedtest, etc. between the radios directly, and their gateway is the
router on the ethernet interface. Two birds, one stone.
On 10/6/2014 9:44 PM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
This came up before, but I cant find the thread. is the attached
configuration the correct way to set up access to the radios?
I had initially thought having the radios in the same subnet is how it
is supposed to be, primarily because thats how it always was, but with
having the radios in a /30 on each side of the link you would be able
to access the local side radio if the link were to drop.
Is this the correct way of looking at this or is there a better method
of maintaining access in a dynamic environment??
--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that
the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if
you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all
means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925
