I think the key thing here is the f/b ratio and the pattern.   10dB is
fine if you are using DFS frequencies anyway.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt via
Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:08 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

 

The pattern is not like a normal sector it opens wider at elevation.

 

 

 

Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Gino Villarini via
Af
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014 16:28
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

 

I thinkt he innovative thing here is the waveguide adapter between the
radios ant the horns/dishes,

 

90deg sector has 10db gain.. Way too low I think

 

 

 

Gino A. Villarini

President

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

www.aeronetpr.com   

@aeronetpr

 

 

 

From: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 at 10:18 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

 

The simper Sectors  http://simper.rfelements.com/

Not clear if the dish is a horn/reflector combination?

 

 

----- GENIAS INTERNET -- www.genias.net <http://www.genias.net> ------

Stefan Englhardt         Email: s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net> 

Dr. Gesslerstr. 20       D-93051 Regensburg

Tel: +49 941 942798-0    Fax: +49 941 942798-9

 

Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Chuck McCown via Af
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014 16:15
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

 

Which product are we talking about?  The one that looks like a dish has
a patch array inside the cover.  

 

From:Ty Featherling via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com>  

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 8:06 AM

To:af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

 

So you're saying this is more marketing than innovation? 

 

-Ty

 

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com>
wrote:

        Angle is pretty much solely dependent upon gain.  So a typical
horn is about as good as the best patch array or a smaller parabolic
reflector.  But they are worse than both in the mechanical sense.  

         

        The higher the frequency the more practical horns become.  

         

        From:Stefan Englhardt via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com> 

        Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:51 AM

        To:af@afmug.com

        Subject: [AFMUG] Rflelements announcement

         

        This is realy something I did not expect: They announce Systems
with Horn antennas.

        A quite different approach. Their sectors are directional
antennas so coverage is not as good

        as with traditional antennas (Their marketing argues the
opposite). But horn antennas

        should have very low sidelobes, a good FB-Ratio and allow small
angles. So it should be possible

        to make a more dense deployment.

        What make me scare is the big opening where water and ice may
cause damage.

         

         

 

Reply via email to