Run the path calc to see what your RSL would be based on the antennas you intend to use, then see what your SNR would be.
You need >25db SNR to stay in 8x. On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Paul McCall via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > I was hoping it might be usable to replace a UBNT 3.65 link at 18 miles > that is getting me only about 35 to 40Mbit of throughput. 60 to 70 Mbit > would be a help. Not sure if that is a reasonable expectation > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Mark > Radabaugh via Af > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:37 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 3.65 > > > > Sorry - didn't catch the extra P > > I have one 5.4 version running. It's actually better on throughput that > I was expecting but we have seen long delays in getting it to establish a > link even with excellent signal strength. > > Mark > > On 10/22/14, 12:27 PM, Paul McCall via Af wrote: > > I want to make sure we are on the same page. Not asking about the PMP450 > 3.65 I am asking about the *PTP*450 3.65 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] On Behalf Of Mark > Radabaugh via Af > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 12:05 PM > To: af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PTP450 3.65 > > > > I do have a 450 on a KP Omni with 44 customers on it. Seems to work > > quite well so far. The longest is at 2.9 miles, most are inside 1 mile. > > > > This is a very space constrained tower with a propensity for getting hit > by lightning. > > > > At some point it will likely be converted to 4 sectors. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > On 10/22/14, 11:53 AM, Matt via Af wrote: > > >> Anybody using these yet? Results? > > > Expensive. Works great. Omni results in less then half range if you > > > go that way though. > > > > > > -- > > Mark Radabaugh > > Amplex > > > > m...@amplex.net <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@amplex.net');> > 419.837.5015 x 1021 > > > > > > > -- > > Mark Radabaugh > > Amplex > > > > m...@amplex.net <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@amplex.net');> > 419.837.5015 x 1021 > >
