pmp500 was not expedience
Gino A. Villarini President Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. www.aeronetpr.com @aeronetpr From: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2014 at 3:06 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pre announce PMP500? ​wasn't that called Expedience or something? ________________________________ From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) via Af <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:10 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Pre announce PMP500? I think the PMP500 is PMP400 based for the Euro 3.5 market. So Motorola did have a 3GHz solution all the way back then, but they didn't give two shits for US/CA 3650 even though we were begging for something for years. On 11/13/2014 10:31 AM, Bill Prince via Af wrote: Noticed this in the CNUT 4.6 supported device types list: PMP 400/430/500 Access Point (AP) PMP 400/430/500 Subscriber Module (SM) Did I miss the memo? -- bp <part-15@SkylineBroadbandService>
