Young lady, I'm an expert on humans.  Now open your mouth and lets have a
look at that brain.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

> uh Zoidberg that is...
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Chuck Macenski via Af <af@afmug.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Why not Zoidburg (airFiber)?
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Sean Heskett via Af <af@afmug.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> i would go licensed gear from SAF (or your favorite licensed PTP vendor).
>>>
>>> we keep all the unlicensed bands available for PMP...we use licensed for
>>> PTP.
>>>
>>> the difference between a wifi backhaul and a licensed backhaul is like
>>> the difference between a Ford Focus and a Ferrari F12berlinetta.  they are
>>> both cars that drive on roads but that's about where the similarities end.
>>>  same thing with backhauls.
>>>
>>> 2 cents
>>>
>>> -sean
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Paul McCall via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Cambium,
>>> >
>>> > Can you please make a suggestion as to what equipment that you
>>> recommend to us for this type of problem/solution?
>>> >
>>> > Paul
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
>>> > Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:32 PM
>>> > To: af@afmug.com
>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>>> >
>>> > For Cambium.... we have a very remote tower that feeds several other
>>> towers.  Everything is OSPF but logically...
>>> >
>>> > Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several
>>> anti-twist devices) is "fed" by...
>>> >         Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a
>>> Mikrotik RB912 5 Ghz
>>> >                 This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of
>>> usable bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A
>>> >         Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5
>>> >                 This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G
>>> >
>>> > Tower R then feeds...
>>> >         Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of
>>> usable bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
>>> >         Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of
>>> usable bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
>>> >         Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of
>>> usable bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
>>> >         Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of
>>> usable bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
>>> >
>>> > To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling
>>> act.  There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect
>>> (chain) to each other on the "back side" and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT
>>> radios on the backside links.
>>> >
>>> > The challenge...
>>> >
>>> > First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C.  And,
>>> I need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect
>>> and then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that.
>>> >
>>> > So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other
>>> than a ton of licensed links?  Obviously, the gear I am using now is
>>> inexpensive.
>>> >
>>> > The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsynced....    can it sync, now or
>>> tomorrow?   Latency with sync?
>>> >
>>> > Paul
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
>>> > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
>>> > To: af@afmug.com
>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > Please allow me to clarify.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two
>>> 10/100 FE ports.
>>> > >
>>> > > The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the
>>> > > single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to
>>> proprietary PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still
>>> use the on board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates).
>>> > >
>>> > > The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in
>>> Release 2.4 and will apply to both products.
>>> >
>>> > Reading this spec sheet.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf
>>> >
>>> > >>>LATENCY (nominal, one way) < 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame
>>> > >>>Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode)
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to