I was also wondering why a -51dBm RX sensitivity when an old BridgeWave GE80 
did it at -61dBm.

 

But I know AOptix has been sepc’d into a lot of projects.  The hybrid approach 
is certainly interesting!

 

Daniel White

(303) 746-3590

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 6:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radios with frickin' laser beams on their heads

 

I also wonder why they didn't go for a full 60 cm reflector on the radio side 
of the unit, to increase the E-band link budget. Based on the diagrams in the 
PDF the actual parabolic reflector in the unit is somewhat smaller than a 
Radiowaves or MTI 60cm antenna tuned for 71-86GHz.

 

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Daniel White via Af <af@afmug.com 
<mailto:af@afmug.com> > wrote:

Did you ask him how to mount a 180lb radio/laser on a tower?  Or the 3ft wide 
by almost 3ft depth?

Just seeing the demo units at trade shows makes me wonder :-)

Daniel White
(303) 746-3590

> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On 
> Behalf Of Caleb Knauer via Af
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 12:30 PM
> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] radios with frickin' laser beams on their heads
>
> Haha funny, had a call with them Friday and then afterwards made the same
> joke.  Really cool sounding product with the auto alignment and live tracking
> features.  Ain't cheap.  Their sales guy was quite knowledgeable and also
> understanding of the product offering and market.
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Eric Kuhnke via Af <af@afmug.com 
> <mailto:af@afmug.com> >
> wrote:
> > http://pages.aoptix.com/rs/aoptixtechnologies/images/AOptix_Intellimax
> > _MB2000_Datasheet.pdf
> >
> > http://thestack.com/aoptix-lasercomm-system-military-laser-radio-rollo
> > ut-171114
> >
> >
> >

> > 80 GHz QPSK link + parallel FSO OOK laser?  Claiming 10km five nines,
> > I bet that's in ITU rain zone A (saudi arabian desert, etc).
> >
> > I wonder how it will stack up on real world performance in the Seattle
> > area vs. a Bridgewave E-band link, 60cm dishes, +19 Tx power, QPSK
> modulation.
> >
> >
> >

 

Reply via email to