Ok call me when u can Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 09:47, Gino Villarini via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > Sell me your 3.65 stuff... > > Gino A. Villarini > @gvillarini > > > > On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Craig House via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> Wouldn't that affect all sms aT the same time >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 2, 2014, at 10:15, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >> >>> You’ve checked that you are not getting LBT events, right? >>> >>> From: Sean Heskett via Af >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:33 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.65 450 >>> >>> Are these links LOS, nLOS or NLOS? >>> >>> Are you using v13.2 firmware on both the AP and SM? >>> >>> Are you using the cambium sectors or another brand? >>> >>> I wouldn't recommend omnis for any links longer than 2milies with clear LOS. >>> >>> Are you using integrated or connectorized SMs? >>> >>> If connectorized SMs the what antenna are the SMs using? >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Tuesday, December 2, 2014, Craig House via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >>>> We have tried both sectors and omni both with and without dishes we have >>>> a great deal of difficulty keeping customers connected to the APs even at >>>> very short distances >>>> We have multiple customers that are 1 to 2 miles away with a dish that are >>>> getting -68-ish signals but will reregister 5 to 6 times a day or more >>>> We have a 4.8 mile shot on a dish that we can't get good throughput on >>>> even though it doesn't drop registration we are trying to run in a 20 MHz >>>> channel however >>>> At this point we have pretty much given up on them and started taking them >>>> all down but I thought it was worth asking in case we were using the wrong >>>> antennas >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> > On Dec 2, 2014, at 09:18, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > When you say you have had little success, what were you expecting it to >>>> > do, that it didn't? >>>> > >>>> > Regarding antenna, my recollection is that it's dual slant, and will >>>> > automatically correct for swapped polarizations (e.g. if you use a >>>> > reflector), but not for using dual slant at one end and V/H at the other >>>> > (like ePMP can do because that magic is baked into the 802.11 chip). >>>> > >>>> > I've had good luck with it, kind of midway between 2.4 and 5 GHz but >>>> > with clean spectrum (especially if you use the upper 25 MHz where >>>> > Ubiquiti doesn't play), somewhat different EIRP rules, and tough to use >>>> > >10 MHz channels. >>>> > >>>> > Are you using sectors, or an omni at the AP? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -----Original Message----- From: Craig House via Af >>>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:08 AM >>>> > To: af@afmug.com >>>> > Subject: [AFMUG] 3.65 450 >>>> > >>>> > Had a discussion with one of my coworkers this morning regarding the 450 >>>> > cambium 3.65 radios >>>> > We have tried it in a couple of locations with little success he >>>> > believes that the 3.65 is not a dual slant radio but rather just dual >>>> > polarity. Can someone tell me who is right? >>>> > >>>> > Sent from my iPhone >>>> >
