I asked KP for an explanation of the differences between them a few months ago. He said he'd contact his engineer but I never heard back. When you look at the antenna profile, at first glance it looks like the KP antenna is better. But once you look closer, it looks like each polarity is just more offset from the other compared to the cambium, which makes the overlapped profile look better. It doesnt look any better to me on paper after closer examination, even though supposedly it's rated better.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > I expect it's like Mike Tyson vs an infant. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Dec 12, 2014 4:04 PM, "Matt via Af" <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone compared the KP 90 degree 3.6GHZ sector with the Cambium >> for use with 450? >> >
