These are not mutually exclusive things... I consider VPLS over a routed infrastructure to be equivalent to "carrier ethernet."

On 12/17/2014 08:30 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
It all depends on your vision and long term strategy�. If you are only ogint to do Internet to residential� well L3 routed is the way to do it� but if you want to to be a player on business/wholesale/carrier market, you need to go Carrier Ethernet�



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 at 12:18 PM
To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ISP Radio Wednesday -- Bridged vs Routed

In my experience MEF related products are very popular with oldschool PSTN operators and big cellular carrier, less so with ISPs that do 100% IP. You can sell an Ethernet tunnel over MPLS just as well.

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Mark Radabaugh via Af <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

    This is where the majority of large carriers are going:

    http://metroethernetforum.org/carrier-ethernet/carrier-ethernet-services

    If you are buying (or selling) services to any of the larger
    carriers you are likely seeing MEF standards in use - Ethernet
    Virtual Connections, NNI and UNI interfaces.

    There are a lot of really nice features in MEF that allow you to
    sell protocol independent Ethernet across your network or across
    multiple networks.  Something like a point to point where Time
    Warner is one end and your customer is on the other end.   Or a
    PMP type of arrangement where 2 customers are on Comcast, 3 are on
    AT&T, and 4 are your wireless customers.   To the customer it just
    appears as if the 9 sites are connected via an Ethernet switch and
    you don't care in the least what addressing or protocols they run.

    If you are selling to any of the cell carriers they expect MEF
    services and specifically Y.1731 performance monitoring.  This
    allows you and your customers to prove that you are actually
    providing the bandwidth, latency, jitter, and uptime.

    MEF adds a great deal of monitoring and troubleshooting capability
    to the network.  It allows you to monitor end to end and within
    your own network in order to identify both to you and your
    partners where a problem exists and who is responsible for it.


-- Mark Radabaugh
    Amplex

    m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net> 419.837.5015 x 1021

!DSPAM:2,5491b0d5316499947210542!

Reply via email to