somthing newer then busybox linux had?> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> wrote:
> What kernel was Mikrotik using 10 years ago? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"timothy steele via Af" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:12:00 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] It's time for a second SSID on the Air Routers and > Air Gateways. > > last I heard they needed to update the Kernal to get multi SSID's to work > & I think they did not in 5.6Beta but I'm sure they want to get 5.6 Final > out fast as they can Multi SSID's i'm sure will get more antenntion after > 5.6 final is out its on beta6 right now.. > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 10:42 AM, That One Guy via Af <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> UBNT amazes me with this, Im pretty sure the multi ESSID thread is the >> longest running active thread on their forum, yet they cant do it. >> Users have found ways to somewhat get it to happen, but not cleanly, but >> they dont have programmatic access to the device >> >> I know this is not a complicated thing, almost every single wireless >> product on the market these days supports it in some form or another. >> >> I could see hiding behind the "well, it wont work with our proprietary >> wireless algorithm" I can see that on the commercial side, but the home >> devices? I doubt anyone on this list is turning that on on airrouters or >> gateways for customers since most customers end devices arent ubiquiti >> products. >> >> I think they dont do it strictly out of spite now >> >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Mike Hammett via Af <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> They'll say, "We weren't aware anyone wanted that." That's what the >>> vendors say when they don't want to actually tell us why they haven't done >>> something. >>> >>> I haven't been too excited about multi-SSID in the macro network, but >>> auto-associated and provisioned CPE would be nice. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Mark Radabaugh via Af" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 31, 2014 7:53:17 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] It's time for a second SSID on the Air Routers >>> and Air Gateways. >>> >>> >>> Make that on all of the products. Two SSID’s on the AP - a ‘install’ >>> SSID that the CPE can associate to by default, and a ‘sector’ SSID that we >>> use to lock the CPE to the sector once it’s installed. >>> >>> What is so hard about this? Cisco Aironet AP's could do this 15 years >>> ago. >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> On Dec 31, 2014, at 8:48 AM, joseph marsh via Af <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> On Dec 30, 2014 11:29 PM, "Rory Conaway via Af" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> As much as I’d like to stay with those devices, lack of a second SSID >>>> for guests for example, is becoming a problem. I had 3 people in the last >>>> 2 weeks ask for this feature and I don’t disagree with them. Come on guys, >>>> we’ve been asking for this for 5 years. It’s time. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory Conaway >>>> Triad Wireless >>>> 4226 S. 37th Street >>>> Phoenix, Az. 85040 >>>> 602-426-0542 >>>> [email protected] >>>> www.triadwireless.net >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> “Mediocrity finds safety in standardization. -- Frederick Crane” >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> > > >
